[Bug 1468995] Review Request: python-geopandas - Geographic pandas extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468995

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Use use "pandas" and "Pandas", inconsistently.

I'd also recommend the trick from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468873#c2 to avoid repeating the
lengthy description text.

Hmm, what's the deal with rtree? http://toblerity.org/rtree/ shows 0.7 as the
latest version. Can you open a bug against the python-Rtree package? Maybe the
maintainer needs to be informed about a new upstream? It also needs a python3
version for this review to proceed.

Everything looks good, but I'll wait with the rest of review until the rtree
situation improves.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux