https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076 --- Comment #34 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/openjdk9Review/V7/java-9-openjdk.spec SRPM URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/openjdk9Review/V7/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.181-1.fc24.src.rpm https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21044824 > > Issues: > ======= > - Spec has this: > # PPC/PPC64 needs -fno-tree-vectorize since -O3 would > # otherwise generate wrong code producing segfaults. > %ifarch %{power64} ppc > EXTRA_CFLAGS="$EXTRA_CFLAGS -fno-tree-vectorize" > removed! ... > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/2017-July/000706.html > - Note: No known owner of > /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/lib/server/classes.jsa Fixed > - Please move config files to /etc/ and link them to /etc in > /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/conf/ See at bottom > - Latest available snapshot should be packaged. > Latest EA build is: jdk-9+180. See: http://jdk.java.net/9/ > I'll not point this out in the next review since this is going to change > soon > again. I trust you'll update to latest available build once approved. Moved to u181 with CPU patches > - Some config files are not in conf: It's likely an upstream issue > as I see them in lib for an upstream build too. Please report a bug. > $ rpm -Vv java-9-openjdk-headless | grep ' c ' | grep lib/security > ......... c > /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/lib/security/blacklisted. > certs > ......... c > /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/lib/security/default. > policy > If the file is not in expected location, jdk will not find it I can move them to conf and link to original location, but as /etc is still in play, then I would rather not touch it. If you insists, I will move them, and link them. ... > > It failed on arm32: > > FWIW, I'd be fine with disabling the slowdebug build on arm32 until this is > fixed. done Config files in etc. I really wont to move them. However it will not be an easy task from point of view of multiple installs and copy-jdk-configs. I would like to not block this review on it. I have already started to work on c-j-c to support this, but there is still some longer way to go. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
