[Bug 1443076] Review Request: java-9-openjdk - OpenJDK Runtime Environment in implementation of java 9 specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076



--- Comment #34 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/openjdk9Review/V7/java-9-openjdk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/openjdk9Review/V7/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.181-1.fc24.src.rpm
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21044824

> 
> Issues:
> =======
> - Spec has this:
>   # PPC/PPC64 needs -fno-tree-vectorize since -O3 would
>   # otherwise generate wrong code producing segfaults.
>   %ifarch %{power64} ppc
>   EXTRA_CFLAGS="$EXTRA_CFLAGS -fno-tree-vectorize"
> 

removed!
...
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/quality-discuss/2017-July/000706.html
> - Note: No known owner of
>   /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/lib/server/classes.jsa

Fixed

> - Please move config files to /etc/ and link them to /etc in
>   /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/conf/

See at bottom

> - Latest available snapshot should be packaged.
>   Latest EA build is: jdk-9+180. See: http://jdk.java.net/9/
>   I'll not point this out in the next review since this is going to change
> soon
>   again. I trust you'll update to latest available build once approved.

Moved to u181 with CPU patches

> - Some config files are not in conf: It's likely an upstream issue
>   as I see them in lib for an upstream build too. Please report a bug.
>   $ rpm -Vv java-9-openjdk-headless | grep ' c ' | grep lib/security
> .........  c
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/lib/security/blacklisted.
> certs
> .........  c
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.0.178-1.fc26.x86_64/lib/security/default.
> policy
> 

If the file is not in expected location, jdk will not find it
I can move them to conf and link to original location, but as /etc is still in
play, then I would rather not touch it.
If you insists, I will move them, and link them.

...
> > It failed on arm32:
> 
> FWIW, I'd be fine with disabling the slowdebug build on arm32 until this is
> fixed.

done



Config files in etc. I really wont to move them. However it will not be an easy
task from point of view of multiple installs and copy-jdk-configs.
I would like to not block this review on it. I have already started to work on
c-j-c to support this, but there is still some longer way to go.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux