Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-02 13:17 EST ------- > Unfortunately that URL in comment 3 is 404 for me. *sigh* fat fingered the rsync. It's there now. > One other thing I noticed is that the package naming is a bit weird. I guess it > comes from upstream, though upstream doesn't have the "git" tacked on at the > end. And what's the "62628" mean, anyway? I don't really see it as a > problem, though. Upstream is something like "blktrace-git-20070730162628.tar.gz" 162628 is a timestamp, 16:26:28. It's how the snap from the upstream tarball is named. I put "git" on the end just trying to follow some of the "pre-release naming conventions" I found on the wiki. I could use a git hash instead if preferred... since there is no release on this upstream package, I'm not really sure how to do the versioning. I'm open to any suggestions. I'm also considering skipping the latex->pdf part of the build process, would lighten up the build & chroot setup a bit, for a little hacker tool like this. There are already man pages & a README. Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review