https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476085 --- Comment #9 from Michael Cullen <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Ok, nearly there. A couple of things about that doc subpackage though. One of the review checklist items is: * License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. it's possible to install the doc subpackage without getting the license file. Conceptually I can see why you might just want the docs (though it's unlikely!) so maybe the best thing to do is to include the license file in the docs package as well? Also, I wonder if the doc package should be noarch? Other than that it looks good. that pthread thing looks ugly and I can't help thinking there's something else going on there but it'll do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
