https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341662 --- Comment #15 from František Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- New SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00583062-fedora-developer-portal/fedora-developer-portal.spec New SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00583062-fedora-developer-portal/fedora-developer-portal-0.9.4-0.1.git167ae09.fc27.src.rpm I've bundled few gems to mitigate rubygem-therubyracer not being built and maintained in latest Fedoras. I think bundling only for build time is OK. The other option would be to patch upstream jekyll-lunr-js-search to rely for JS on rubygem-execjs instead of rubygem-therubyracer or strip out search completely (which is broken right now anyway in packaged version). Regarding building the noarch package in Fedora infra - can I rely on x86_64 builder or not? Cause bundled libv8 is architecture-specific (and %ifarch didn't work for me in mock, probably because of noarch package) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
