Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-01 20:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > >especially if the hwdata version is more > > recent than lshw's... > > And one point of maintaining the db, I will look into this issue and make a > decision, thanks for the hands up. I would suggest that there should be only one implementation of each of these files within Fedora and hwdata package is currently the place for this information. My current F7 hwdata is a release from 2007-04, though. My suggestion would be to not include in the lshw package files already supplied by hwdata. This means that when the source of those files is updated, and we want lshw to be able to use them, we would request an update to the hwdata package. lshw would Requires hwdata. Lyonel: Is updated hwdata files a sole cause for a new lshw release ? If you are preparing to release a fix/enhancement, do you always retrieve/include updated hwdata files ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review