[Bug 1458840] Review Request: urw-base35-fonts - Level 2 Core Font Set for Ghostscript

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458840

David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkaspar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(dkaspar@xxxxxxxxx |needinfo?(zdohnal@xxxxxxxxx
                   |m)                          |m)



--- Comment #27 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkaspar@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
The latest version:
>> https://dkaspar.fedorapeople.org/share/reviews/urw-base35-fonts/v4/

 * Added requirement for 'fontpackages-filesystem', to deal with ownership of
/usr/share/fonts (this package, however, should be installed on Fedora by
default)
 * Split the %description line to avoid warnings about description being longer
than 80 characters.

>From version 3:
 * 'font.dir' and 'font.scale' files have been marked as %ghost files
 * the upgrading process has been fixed (proper Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts)

Known issues:
 * error message during installation if the user does not have X11 running:
 > xset:  unable to open display ""

 ... This has been already reported in BZ #1466254. I expect to reroute the
output of that command into /dev/null before F27 Beta, if this is not fixed in
X11 by then.

 * 2 errors regarding 'unknown Type 1 Weight' of the fonts. This is produced by
the 'mkfontscale' command, and this is a bug in the fonts source itself.

 ... I have already reported this to both upstream and URW++, and I'm waiting
for their reply. In case they don't fix it, I will add a patch myself that I've
created for it. But I don't want to hide the error messages from those
commands, because this helps us identify if the fonts became somehow corrupt
during rebase. In that case, we can apply patches/report it to upstream, and
not just silently hide it.

NOTE: I will still be adding fontconfig & appstream files, but these are not
mandatory, and I will ask for a review of them in Fedora's fontconfig mailing
list. In other words, this is not a blocker for finishing the review.

Best regards,

Dee'Kej

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux