[Bug 1308488] Review Request: mediaconch - Most relevant technical and tag data for video and audio files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308488



--- Comment #14 from Vitaly Zaitsev <vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Manual checks:

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.

Pass.

[ ]: Package contains no static executables.

Pass.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.

Pass.

[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MPL (v2.0)", "*No copyright* CC by-sa (v4.0)", "GPL (v3 or
     later)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)". 446
     files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/vitaly/1308488-mediaconch/licensecheck.txt

Pass. But some of source files don't contain license preamble. You should ask
upstream to add it.

[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

Pass.

[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.

Pass.

[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /etc/mediaconch
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/mediaconch

Fail. Directory ownership /etc/mediaconch can be fixed during import to Fedora
SCM.

[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.

Pass.

[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.

Pass.

[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.

Pass.

[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.

Pass.

[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package

Pass.

[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.

Pass.

[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).

Pass.

[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.

Pass.

[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.

Pass.

[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.

Pass.

[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.

Pass.

[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

Pass.

[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.

Pass.

[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.

Pass.

[ ]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
     contains icons.
     Note: icons in mediaconch-gui

Pass.

[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.

Pass.

[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.

Pass.

[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 6 files.

Pass.

[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines

Pass.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux