https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472405 --- Comment #2 from Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the review. In looking at the naming guidelines for addon packages, it says the package should be named %{parent}-%{child}. I take it to mean gdb is the parent and exploitable is the child. To add python would probably mean people can't find it when doing "dnf list gdb*". I changed the cp command to have an 'a' in it. I moved the license file to be under a %license tag. Updated spec file and srpm have been put to the same place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
