https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961 --- Comment #10 from Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry for the late reply. I was on the road for some time. (In reply to Dave Love from comment #9) > Of course you can use the changes. I don't think it's necessary to > attribute changes from a review, and they're not copyright-significant. > > Have you seen the discussion on fedora-devel about un-versioned bundled > provides? I just added your patch to the spec file and refreshed the source rpm as well the spec file in its initial location. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~hsowa/datamash.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~hsowa/datamash-1.1.1-1.fc25.src.rpm F26: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20521975 F25: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20521994 EPEL7: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20522005 rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20522110 I couldn't figure out which target is for epel6. :/ What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
