https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 Marek Cermak <macermak@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Marek Cermak <macermak@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/sysusage See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names - Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl, /usr/share/perl5, /etc/cron.d, /var/www /usr/share/perl5 is owned by perl-libs-5.26.0-394.fc27.x86_64 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ is owned by perl-libs-5.26.0-394.fc27.x86_64 /var/www is owned by httpd-filesystem-2.4.27-1.fc27.noarch file /etc/cron.d is not owned by any package - %build : Remove the DESTDIR=%{buildroot} from the build section, if not possible, check that nothing is being built into the directory during build section. - See "NOTES" at the end of this document for more info and todos. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 28 files have unknown license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl, /usr/share/perl5, /etc/cron.d, /var/www [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 153600 bytes in 5 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Perl: [x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in sysusage-common , sysusage-httpd , sysusage-rsysusage [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: sysusage-5.5-1.fc27.noarch.rpm sysusage-common-5.5-1.fc27.noarch.rpm sysusage-httpd-5.5-1.fc27.noarch.rpm sysusage-rsysusage-5.5-1.fc27.noarch.rpm sysusage-5.5-1.fc27.src.rpm sysusage.spec sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perl -> Perl, peel, perk sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US informations -> information, information's, in formations sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javascript -> java script, java-script, JavaScript sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US throught -> through, thought, through t sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plateforms -> platforms, plate forms, plate-forms sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US embeded -> embedded, embed ed, embed-ed sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programing -> programming, monogramming, program sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lesspossible -> less possible, less-possible, impossible sysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sysusagegraph sysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sysusagejqgraph sysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sysusagewarn sysusage-common.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rsysusage -> sausage sysusage-httpd.noarch: W: no-documentation sysusage-rsysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) util -> til, until, u til sysusage-rsysusage.noarch: W: no-documentation sysusage-rsysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rsysusage sysusage.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perl -> Perl, peel, perk sysusage.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) rrdtool -> toolbar sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US informations -> information, information's, in formations sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rrdtool -> toolbar sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javascript -> java script, java-script, JavaScript sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jqplot -> plot sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US throught -> through, thought, through t sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plateforms -> platforms, plate forms, plate-forms sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US embeded -> embedded, embed ed, embed-ed sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programing -> programming, monogramming, program sysusage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lesspossible -> less possible, less-possible, impossible sysusage.src:1: W: macro-in-comment %global sysusage.src:102: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build DESTDIR=%{buildroot} sysusage.spec:1: W: macro-in-comment %global There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. sysusage.spec:102: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build DESTDIR=%{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it may break short circuit builds. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 31 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sysusage-common.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rsysusage -> sausage sysusage-rsysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) util -> til, until, u til sysusage-rsysusage.noarch: W: no-documentation sysusage-rsysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rsysusage sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) perl -> Perl, peel, perk sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US informations -> information, information's, in formations sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javascript -> java script, java-script, JavaScript sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US throught -> through, thought, through t sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plateforms -> platforms, plate forms, plate-forms sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US embeded -> embedded, embed ed, embed-ed sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programing -> programming, monogramming, program sysusage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lesspossible -> less possible, less-possible, impossible sysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sysusagegraph sysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sysusagejqgraph sysusage.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sysusagewarn sysusage-httpd.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings. Requires -------- sysusage-common (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): config(sysusage-common) sysusage-rsysusage (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/perl sysstat sysusage-common sysusage (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/perl config(sysusage) crontabs perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.0) perl(Time::HiRes) rrdtool sysstat sysusage-common sysusage-rsysusage sysusage-httpd (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): config(sysusage-httpd) httpd sysusage Provides -------- sysusage-common: config(sysusage-common) sysusage-common sysusage-rsysusage: sysusage-rsysusage sysusage: config(sysusage) sysusage sysusage-httpd: config(sysusage-httpd) sysusage-httpd LICENCECHECK ------------ GPL (v3 or later) ----------------- sysusage-5.5/Sar.pm sysusage-5.5/bin/rsysusage sysusage-5.5/bin/sysusage sysusage-5.5/bin/sysusagegraph sysusage-5.5/bin/sysusagejqgraph sysusage-5.5/bin/sysusagewarn Unknown or generated -------------------- sysusage-5.5/ChangeLog sysusage-5.5/INSTALL sysusage-5.5/LICENSE sysusage-5.5/MANIFEST sysusage-5.5/Makefile.PL sysusage-5.5/README sysusage-5.5/TODO sysusage-5.5/doc/SysUsage.pod sysusage-5.5/doc/sysusage.1 sysusage-5.5/packaging/README sysusage-5.5/packaging/RPM/sysusage.spec sysusage-5.5/packaging/debian/create-deb-tree.sh sysusage-5.5/packaging/debian/sysusage/DEBIAN/control sysusage-5.5/packaging/debian/sysusage/DEBIAN/postinst sysusage-5.5/packaging/debian/sysusage/DEBIAN/prerm sysusage-5.5/packaging/slackbuild/README sysusage-5.5/packaging/slackbuild/SysUsage.SlackBuild sysusage-5.5/packaging/slackbuild/SysUsage.info sysusage-5.5/packaging/slackbuild/doinst.sh sysusage-5.5/packaging/slackbuild/slack-desc sysusage-5.5/plugins/plugin-sample1.pl sysusage-5.5/plugins/plugin-sample2.pl sysusage-5.5/resources/favicon.ico sysusage-5.5/resources/jqplot-sysusage.tar.gz sysusage-5.5/resources/sysusage-logo.png sysusage-5.5/resources/sysusage.css sysusage-5.5/resources/sysusage.js sysusage-5.5/resources/sysusage_arrow.png Source checksums ---------------- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/sysusage/sysusage/5.5/sysusage-5.5.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 5d857cf1e62aedde6f13055608e402c8ba92acdac418bf1441f0027def97ebac CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5d857cf1e62aedde6f13055608e402c8ba92acdac418bf1441f0027def97ebac NOTES ----- - Orphaned package - name conflict permitted - For package ownership information, see : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function or https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies - Correction of the spelling in specfile - Consider using %{?_isa} to fully define Requires - Consider putting content of Web App into /usr/share/%{name} instead of /var/www/ - Change %doc LICENSE -> %license LICENSE - Not necessary anymore to compare %if 0%{?fedora} > 17 - Rpmlint is complaining about the #%global comment - note that to escape the whole macro, #%% is needed, also, it could actually be deleted completely. Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1421413 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Perl Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
