https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468949 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - License: field is incorrect, should be "MIT and Python". - Missing Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-libs for /usr/include/python3.4m ownership in the python34-greenlet-devel subpackage. - Missing Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{modname}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in the python34-greenlet-devel subpackage. - You should make use of python3_version and python3_version_nodots instead of using wildcards in %files sections. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "PSF (v2)", "Unknown or generated". 62 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/rathann/build/review/1468949-python3-greenlet/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/python3.4m [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 8 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python34-greenlet , python34-greenlet-devel , python3-greenlet- debuginfo [?]: Package functions as described. [-]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python34-greenlet-0.4.11-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm python34-greenlet-devel-0.4.11-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm python3-greenlet-debuginfo-0.4.11-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm python3-greenlet-0.4.11-1.el7.centos.src.rpm python34-greenlet.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tasklets -> task lets, task-lets, skeletal python34-greenlet.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Tasklets -> Task lets, Task-lets, Skeletal python3-greenlet.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tasklets -> task lets, task-lets, skeletal python3-greenlet.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Tasklets -> Task lets, Task-lets, Skeletal 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: python3-greenlet-debuginfo-0.4.11-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-greenlet-debuginfo.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib python34-greenlet.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/greenlet [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Requires -------- python3-greenlet-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python34-greenlet (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython3.4m.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) python34-greenlet-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python34-greenlet Provides -------- python3-greenlet-debuginfo: python3-greenlet-debuginfo python3-greenlet-debuginfo(x86-64) python34-greenlet: python34-greenlet python34-greenlet(x86-64) python34-greenlet-devel: python34-greenlet-devel python34-greenlet-devel(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- python34-greenlet: /usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/greenlet.cpython-34m.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/archive/0.4.11.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 66de57ea93ff54f64edc0b235e92d83bb9a4bd8cd69ee325d9300f02547d4320 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 66de57ea93ff54f64edc0b235e92d83bb9a4bd8cd69ee325d9300f02547d4320 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -P Python -m epel-7-x86_64 -b 1468949 Buildroot used: epel-7-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
