https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169926 Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |projects.rg@xxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- IMHO it's better to build a package of Jiab77/systemd-zram instead, that project [1] has nearly the same code base and particularly a proper and valid licensing as MIT with full license text [2]. Although your spec file as well the upstream spec file say it's GPLv2, we can not verify the requirement [3] to ship the license text. You could point upstream to include license as headers [4] into their shell scripts. [1] https://github.com/Jiab77/systemd-zram [2] https://github.com/Jiab77/systemd-zram/blob/master/LICENSE [3] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#WhyMustIInclude [4] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#NoticeInSourceFile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
