[Bug 226633] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226633


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora

tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-31 18:33 EST -------
Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages.

5026bdaf644178fee66a26190453b0dddb99558b8c97c4a592a482a2434dc862 
xf86-video-via-0.2.2.tar.bz2

rpmlint says:
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0
  I think these are problematic.  Or is there some reason an ldconfig pass isn't 
  needed here?

W: xorg-x11-drv-via-devel no-documentation
W: xorg-x11-drv-via mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 3)
  Not problematic.

Plus 56 undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints in /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
and /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0.  I note that the same issues are present
in the XvMC libs from the i810 driver.  Maybe there's something special about
XvMC libraries?

* File and directory ownership looks good.
* debuginfo package looks good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]