[Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231





------- Additional Comments From james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-31 18:13 EST -------
> * -ggdb3 does. If GCC doesn't support it, your package won't build nor will it
> be usable

 You are saying -ggdb3 Changes the ABI? I don't think so.
 Yes, that is somewhat of a GCC specific option. As are all the -W flags.
 If that's the only objection, I'm not that bothered about droping that.

> Yes, -O2 always reduces debug-ability of the code, so what is the problem you
> are trying to solve?

 Ok, so explaining again:

. The srpm currently produces 6 packages, the most relevant to this are the two
"main" ones:

ustr-1.0.1-0.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm
ustr-debug-1.0.1-0.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm

...the first is the library built for "production", and is what all the people
using a program that uses the library will see. The second is _the same code_
built using as much debugging as possible, so (expensive) internal consistency
checks are called often; optimizations are turned down; etc.
 The idea being that anyone developing code using the library can use the
debugging version while doing development and it will actively alert them to
errors. Forcing build flags that make debugging harder when using this package
is not doing to help anyone.

> I guess you will understand, that I consider your answer to be non-acceptable
> and inappropriate.

 Actually I didn't, and still don't, understand that ... I said I would do what
you wanted to follow policy, even though it was wrong, and I repeatedly asked
how I could fix policy.
 Is one not allowed to point out that policy is wrong?

 I can't imagine what I said that was inappropriate.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]