https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441803 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- %description should be wrapped to <80 columns. Url, Source0: http → https. Rpmlint ------- Checking: kproperty-3.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm kproperty-devel-3.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm kproperty-debuginfo-3.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm kproperty-3.0.1-1.fc27.src.rpm kproperty.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C A property editing framework with editor widget similar to what is known from Qt Designer. kproperty.src: E: description-line-too-long C A property editing framework with editor widget similar to what is known from Qt Designer. Right. kproperty.x86_64: W: no-documentation kproperty.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id kproperty.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id kproperty-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib kproperty-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The rest is OK. kproperty.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libKPropertyCore3.so.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 kproperty.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libKPropertyCore3.so.3.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 kproperty.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libKPropertyWidgets3.so.3.0 /lib64/libKF5ConfigGui.so.5 kproperty.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libKPropertyWidgets3.so.3.0 /lib64/libQt5Xml.so.5 kproperty.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libKPropertyWidgets3.so.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 kproperty.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libKPropertyWidgets3.so.3.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 Hm, those might be worth cleaning up. At least libKF5ConfigGui, libQt5Xml. + package name is OK + licence is acceptable for Fedora (LGPLv2+) + license is specified correctly + builds and installs OK + P/R/BR look correct (some Requires might be trimmed possibly) + scriptlets follow the guidelines + fedora-review finds no issues Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
