[Bug 1462412] Review Request: tworld - a puzzle game

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462412

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |POST
                 CC|                            |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
rpmlint:

tworld-data.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/tworld-data/COPYING
Who cares? ;)

tworld.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man6/tworld.6.gz 2:
warning: macro `LO' not defined
The page seems to display OK, so this can be ignored.

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 8 warnings.

make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build, optionally.

$ appstream-util validate  /usr/share/appdata/tworld.appdata.xml
/usr/share/appdata/tworld.appdata.xml: FAILED:
• tag-invalid           : <metadata_license> is not valid [CC-BY-SA-3.04.0]
• tag-invalid           : <project_license> is not valid [GPLv2+]SPDX ID
'GPLv2+' unknown
• tag-missing           : <translation> not specified
• tag-missing           : <update_contact> is not present
• attribute-invalid     : <screenshot> width too small
[http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tworld/ss/full1.jpg]
• attribute-invalid     : <screenshot> height too small
[http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tworld/ss/full1.jpg]

metadata_license should be " CC-BY-SA-3.0", project_license "GPL-2.0+",
according to https://spdx.org/licenses/. Displays OK in gnome-software apart
from the license.

The game data satisfies the requirements for "firmware"
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware],
and can be packaged. The license text is in CCLP?.html.

+ license is acceptable for Fedora (GPLv2+, "no mods" for the game data)
+ license is specified correctly
+ package name is OK
+ builds, install, runs OK
+ scriptlets are correct according to guidelines
+ P/R/BR look correct

Just some nitpicks. Your packaging foo is very strong ;)
Package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux