[Bug 1450590] Review Request: watchman - a file watching service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590

sid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #9 from sid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
Hi folks -- I'm a Fedora package maintainer (albeit for a small package), and
also one of the original authors of Watchman. I'm very interested in getting
Watchman into Fedora -- we believe it's the most robust directory watching tool
in existence.

I understand and respect the motivations behind wanting to unbundle libraries,
but as Wez pointed out in
https://github.com/facebook/watchman/issues/474#issuecomment-303563584 that
wouldn't be appropriate here. We've forked these libraries and made invasive
changes to them -- they're effectively internal components at this point. It is
not really possible to extricate our changes, unfortunately.

Consider a slightly different situation where we wrote a JSON library,
wildmatch, libart etc from scratch for Watchman. I'm sure unbundling wouldn't
be a problem in that case. Would it be possible to treat our current situation
as this slightly different but still legitimate one?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux