https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929 --- Comment #17 from René Cannaò <rene.cannao@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Augusto Caringi from comment #16) > (In reply to René Cannaò from comment #13) > > Hi all, > > > > Author of ProxySQL here. > > First of all, thank you for considering including ProxySQL in Fedora > > official repository. > > I will share my thoughts. > > René, thank you very much for joining this discussion, your opinion is very > important here. Thank you! > > About [1] : > > my vote goes for 1.3 as well, to create a new user. > > Good to know. > > > About [2]: > > support for ARM should be as simple as removing all spinlock (this is where > > assembly code is used) and replace them with pthread rwlock. It is on my > > todo list. > > That's nice, I've seen your latest commits removing spinlocks. > > > About the dependencies currently bundled, the easy to de-bundle are > > libconfig and libdamon. > > SQLite3 is also patched, and there are features in the roadmap that require > > SQLite 3.15 , for example https://github.com/sysown/proxysql/issues/1011 > > But the latest stable version of ProxySQL (1.3.7) has a unpatched SQLite, > right? That's absolutely correct! > I think that we can de-bundle it by now, and in upcoming versions see what's > the best approach. I agree. > Fedora 26 will ship with SQLite 3.19. Would be good if we could be able to > upstream this 'from_unixtime' patch > (https://github.com/sysown/proxysql/blob/master/deps/sqlite3/from_unixtime. > patch) and keep using a de-bundled SQLite in the future. What do you think? I will ping Dr. Richard Hipp on this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
