https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452985 --- Comment #16 from Gerd Pokorra <gp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- It is easier and better to use the perl6 script 'tools/install-dist.pl' to packaging perl6 modules, I think. At the URL - ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/rakudo-json-tiny/srpm/rakudo-json-tiny-0.20170612git-1.fc25.src.rpm I uploaded an srpm as example that uses the perl6 program 'install-dist.pl'. The file is included as Source1 and taken from Radkudo 2017.05 and is the same in Raduod-Star 2017.05. I intend to make a new rakudo package that provides the install-dist.pl tool and store it as %{_libdir}/perl6/bin/mod_inst.pl. I intent also to add a macro for it: %perl6_mod_inst /usr/lib64/perl6/bin/mod_inst.pl The SRPM rakudo-json-tiny uses the macros (rakudo_rpm_version and erl6_vendor_dir) from the rakudo package that is currently in the testing state: $ bodhi rakudo | head -2 No handlers could be found for logger "fedora.client.bodhi" 14 updates found (14 shown) rakudo-0.2017.04.2-4.fc25 enhancement testing 2017-06-09 rakudo-0.2017.04.2-4.fc26 enhancement testing 2017-06-09 $ Could the review of the zef package go on? It is at least a nice tool to list the installed Perl6 modules: $ zef list --installed ===> Found via /usr/lib64/perl6/site zef:ver('0.1.14'):auth('github:ugexe') XML::Writer ===> Found via /usr/lib64/perl6 CORE:ver('6.c'):auth('perl') ===> Found via /usr/lib64/perl6/vendor JSON::Tiny $ Is the use of export QA_SKIP_BUILD_ROOT=1 a reason that the package can not pass the review or does it not matter? As next I will make builds that use the new macros. For the zef package I like the %{perl6_site_dir} as destination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
