https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458840 --- Comment #17 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkaspar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zdenek Dohnal from comment #3) > Now I'll post outputs of rpmlint of source rpm and binary rpms: > > $ rpmlint -iv urw-base35-fonts-20160926-1.fc27.src.rpm > urw-base35-fonts.src: I: checking > urw-base35-fonts.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) distributable -> > distributed, distributive, attributable > The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/distributable http://www.dictionary.com/browse/distributable > urw-base35-fonts.src: E: description-line-too-long C This meta-package will > install all the 35 fonts from the urw-base35-fonts sub-packages. > Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is exceeding > this number, cut it to fit in two lines. Fixed. > urw-base35-fonts.src: I: checking-url https://www.urwpp.de/en/ (timeout 10 > seconds) Works for me: https://www.urwpp.de/en/ > urw-base35-fonts.src: W: no-%build-section > The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't > directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to > provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of > automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty. We are not building the fonts from sources, and we certainly do not need debuginfo packages for fonts. > urw-base35-fonts.src: I: checking-url > http://downloads.ghostscript.com/public/fonts/urw-base35-20160926.zip > (timeout 10 seconds) > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. =============================================================================== (In reply to Zdenek Dohnal from comment #4) > $ rpmlint -iv urw-base35-c059-fonts-20160926-1.fc27.noarch.rpm > urw-base35-c059-fonts.noarch: I: checking > urw-base35-c059-fonts.noarch: I: checking-url https://www.urwpp.de/en/ > (timeout 10 seconds) > urw-base35-c059-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation > The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include > documentation files. The documentation is not mandatory, and upstream does not provide any, because again - there are just fonts. I will add the documentation if upstream creates one in the future. > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This applies to other font subpackages as well. =============================================================================== (In reply to Zdenek Dohnal from comment #6) > urw-base35-fonts.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided urw-fonts > If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package > should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency > breakage. > If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, > leave out the Provides. Here is the package being obsoleted: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=856388 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
