[Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231





------- Additional Comments From james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-30 13:52 EST -------

 Ralf, I'm not sure if you know the context for the above. The Fedora flags are,
roughly:

-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic

...and you appear to be saying that adding other options is fine, as long as you
don't change the behaviour of any of the above? (although I'd be shocked if
nothing did -Wno-* which turned off a -Wall option).
 I can sort of understand it for all of them apart from -O1, but what is the
rationale for requiring optimizations at that specific level? This is esp. true
given that we are talking about _sub-package_ specifically for development, with
the main package using the exact CFLAGS you want.
 You are requiring making the debugging worse in Fedora, for no good reason that
I can see. If you are going to hold to that line, due to it being policy, I'd
like to know how I can go about getting this policy fixed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]