https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448040 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Review ======= - rpmlint checks return: python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcluster python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcluster-2 python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcluster-2.7 python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcontroller python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcontroller-2 python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcontroller-2.7 python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipengine python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipengine-2 python2-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipengine-2.7 python3-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcluster-3 python3-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcluster-3.6 python3-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcontroller-3 python3-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipcontroller-3.6 python3-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipengine-3 python3-ipyparallel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipengine-3.6 python2-ipyparallel-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-ipyparallel-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation All safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets python and general packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, text in %license, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (50870b9ced63bb776b1409a5fe980837cdff093e8fcfe1aa2eb4ab4434c4eb60) - package compiles on f26 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - test suite run APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
