https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076 Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #20 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #19) > (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #16) > > - if config is in /etc then you need to back up only this directory, /usr > > is supposed to be restorable from package contents > > Any config file is, isnt? Even if it is in etc... If you modify config file, then how are you going to restore your (modified) config from package contents? > I see two issues > - all javas up to now had configs in java_home, which in /usr/lib/jvm/theJdk > - so if your concerns are applicable, then they have to be revisited Have to? Theoretically older Javas could use existing (non-FHS compliant) location, but Java 9 could use the new location. > - config files were decided to be in jdk, as they are supposed to be jdk x > cluster specific. So this is fundametnal chage to java in fedora/rhel. I don't see any fundamental change here. You would just move config files from /usr to /etc and leave symlinks where config files used to be. No functional changes, but you gain FHS compliance. > If we agreed on this, are you ok with simply symlinks? Yes, symlinks are perfectly fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
