[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673



--- Comment #67 from Michal Vala <mvala@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> 
> Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with
> classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self
> requires we are done here. Can you  publish one more spec+srpm (eventually
> also with scratch) which we can test?
> 

.build-id is clarified by Fabio Valentini and self requires seems to be correct
in latest state.

Jonny: Can you please add requires java/java-devel and I suggest licenses as
GPL2 with classpath exception + BSD for fxpackager?

If no-one has any other comments and you include these changes, I'll approve
this review.

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux