https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 --- Comment #63 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #62) > (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #61) > > Maybe also your indivdual subpackages (src, javadoc, [devel]) should be > > bound by NVR[A] with main package. Well the devel have same fun with [arch] > > :) > > I used openjdk as a guide for what parent package to the subpacakges should > require. javadoc packages tends to have no requires, while source and devel > did have requires on the parent. yup, go on with that. > > Looks like there will be no issues with require with devel as noarch: > > $ rpm -q --requires -p openjfx-devel-8.0.152-8.b03.fc25.noarch.rpm > /bin/sh > openjfx(x86-64) = 8.0.152-8.b03.fc25 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Thank you for verification. Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self requires we are done here. Can you publish one more spec+srpm (eventually also with scratch) which we can test? TYVM! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
