[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673



--- Comment #63 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #62)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #61) 
> > Maybe also your indivdual subpackages (src, javadoc, [devel]) should be
> > bound by NVR[A] with main package. Well the devel have same fun with [arch]
> > :)
> 
> I used openjdk as a guide for what parent package to the subpacakges should
> require. javadoc packages tends to have no requires, while source and devel
> did have requires on the parent. 

yup, go on with that.
> 
> Looks like there will be no issues with require with devel as noarch:
> 
> $ rpm -q --requires -p openjfx-devel-8.0.152-8.b03.fc25.noarch.rpm
> /bin/sh
> openjfx(x86-64) = 8.0.152-8.b03.fc25
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

Thank you for verification.


Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with
classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self requires
we are done here. Can you  publish one more spec+srpm (eventually also with
scratch) which we can test?

TYVM!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux