https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673 Mario Torre <neugens@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |neugens@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #48 from Mario Torre <neugens@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #46) > It looks like most the the license issues is from the web mobule that we do > not package. I gave a look at the package, it seems a very good start, good work! > The fxpackager module is licensed BSD I think the module is also GPLv2+Classpath, there are only few bits in the Makefile that have no license header, the tool incorrectly deduces them to be CDDL, but the license for the project applies there. The webcore stuff is LGPLv2 or later, it's compatible with the GPLv2 but I understand we don't ship those, so we may want to consider to remove the sources we don't build/need. The javascript stuff is more tricky, since it's Apache. Again, if we don't use those, we may want to remove this code from the source bundles. That said, I don't think it makes that much of a difference, those are simply bundled libraries, not part of the JavaFX codebase. I will need to ask for advice here, but I doubt this is a real issue. My hope is that we will be able to compile the web stuff too at some point, that's a really nice feature of JavaFX but we can't use it in the packaged version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
