https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450633 --- Comment #15 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> --- Several of these are all already owned. 1/ For example, $ rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/mimetypes hicolor-icon-theme-0.15-4.fc26.noarch keepassx-2.0.3-3.fc26.x86_64 In this case, we are at this section of the packaging guidelines - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership Specifically, here- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package We do not need hicolor-icon-theme, but hicolor-icon-theme is required by pretty much every graphical environment. So, it is proper for hicolor to own these directories. 2/ We need shared-mime-info for a graphical package to function $ rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/mime/packages shared-mime-info-1.8-2.fc26.x86_64 So, this is safe to ignore as well. 3/ /usr/share/mimelnk This is not owned by any other package and so, keepassxc should own it. $ dnf repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/mimelnk/ determining the fastest mirror (6 hosts).. done. Fedora 26 - x86_64 - Test Updates 3.6 MB/s | 20 MB 00:05 determining the fastest mirror (6 hosts).. done. Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu May 18 10:40:01 2017 EDT. Does this clear up? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
