Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From ahabig@xxxxxxx 2007-07-30 01:50 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Updated package files, with your concerns addressed: Spec URL: http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/yum-cron.spec SRPM URL: http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/yum-cron-0.2-5.src.rpm Questions/comments: Regarding the "We Are Upstream" bit: Added the comments. Momentarily took out the URL field (which points to the main yum website) since, well, We Are Upstream. But rpmlint didn't like not having a URL. What's the appropriate URL to use in this case? Regarding the dist tag: went and read all about it, and think that it's not appropriate here. The same spec file will happily work for all dists which are using the yum after which the cron files were yanked, yum-3.0. So, I changed the "requires" to yum >= 3.0, which should cover all the bases. I see what you mean about the initscripts - it's moving to a whole new format, while this script is of the old format. I'll work on understanding and porting to the new standards, but that won't happen for a while and I appreciate you not blocking things while I do so. One warning - I'm about to embark on a two-week combination of moving my family to another town (on sabbatical this coming year) and camping/vacation trip, so will have spotty net.access in the interim. So, please don't be offended if I'm not so responsive till mid-August. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review