https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448451 Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for trying this out and showing that it can be done, but I do not agree with this approach at all. >From a user perspective, even if you want to build qt5-doc from a single SRPM, you still have to split it into subpackages, possibly with a metapackage that requires them all. What's the point of splitting qt5-* including -devel if -doc is monolithic? And doing things this way is an issue for QtWebEngine because QtWebEngine can be upgraded without the rest of Qt (as has been done for 5.8), and so the docs in this monolithic package (or even in a subpackage of it if you introduce them) will not match the actual package. Therefore, in my role of the QtWebEngine maintainer, I explicitly disapprove the Obsoletes on qt5-qtwebengine-doc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
