Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx 2007-07-28 01:50 EST ------- I have figured out the problem. This program does not use a Autoconf/Automake generated Makefile. In the top-most Makefile it sets BOUML_LIB = /usr/lib/bouml and thus irrespective of the host machine it puts everything in /usr/lib and not /usr/lib64, where that is applicable. Hence using %{_lib} and %{_libdir} leads to the failure. One more thing which concerns me are the following lines in src/Makefile : CFLAGS = -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT CXXFLAGS = -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT Will the use of -march=i386 in the C and C++ compiler flags also lead to problems? For your reference I had tried a build by prepending the following line to the SPEC file: %define _lib lib ...and it successfully built. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review