https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Re: comment 3 lower... like 0? I'd assumed that had been used before, and didn't want to risk it. As far symbol versioning, that's only really required if the soname stays the same, which is not the case here. Re: comment 4 Requires more patching, I think the full library name is stored internally, I didn't think I could rename it without more work (and would be more fragile). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
