Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 dev@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(andreas@xxxxxxxxx)| ------- Additional Comments From dev@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-28 01:08 EST ------- Package name: PASS (ngircd) License: PASS (GPL) Spec Legible: PASS (en_US) md5sum matches: PASS rpmlint clean: NOTES Builds correctly: PASS (i386) RPaths removed: PASS Spec has %clean: PASS Macro use consistant: PASS Contains code/content: PASS -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: NA -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: NA Contains %doc: PASS Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: PASS rm -rf %{buildroot}: PASS RPM uses valid UTF-8: PASS %defattr is set: PASS No duplicate %files: PASS Not relocatable: PASS Calls ldconfig: PASS Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: NOTES I believe the tcp_wrappers issue still exists, so does the patch issue (please fix at some point) E: ngircd non-standard-gid /var/run/ngircd ngircd E: ngircd non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/ngircd 0775 E: ngircd non-standard-gid /etc/ngircd.motd ngircd E: ngircd non-readable /etc/ngircd.motd 0660 E: ngircd non-standard-gid /etc/ngircd.conf ngircd E: ngircd non-readable /etc/ngircd.conf 0660 E: ngircd use-tmp-in-%pre non-standard/non-readable messages can be ignored, use-tmp-in-%pre appears to be a bug. The IPv6 stuff isn't actually policy like I was led to believe, sorry for holding it up though. (Although you might want to file a bug blocking against bug 195271 if you want). Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review