Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2007-07-27 07:39 EST ------- * rpmlint on package: (only one of each) W: alliance devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/alliance/include/msl.h As taken as a compiler, this is acceptable, the path in acceptable also... W: alliance devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/alliance/lib/libCtp.so This one also, as this is not arch dependant...but this may lead to problem later... But: E: alliance arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/alliance/lib/libBtr.so.1 .0.3 This one is wrong - This would be better to have them in libdir/alliance (with the previous symlink as i expect, it will be easier to have them in the same directory). Also maybe this is related to our shlib problem we discussed on #IRC: "libtool: install: warning: `/builddir/build/BUILD/alliance-5.0/abt/src/libAbt.la' has not been installed in `/usr/share/alliance/lib'" Does the .la source file exist ? Here are the output of "rpmlint alliance" on installed files: This is sometime the result of missing libraries LDFLAGS (see attachment) Also i wonder if the binaries aren't subject to the same problem with generic names...(i have'nt checked this...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review