https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440216 Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: ======= - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++ See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 ---> False positive. Guidelines have changed some time ago. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. ---> That's fine for c-compiled Python-extensions. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 80 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/besser82/vm_shared/fedora/review/1440216-python- healpy/licensecheck.txt ---> License-tag is fine. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/.build-id/50 ---> Directories are getting creating automatically. False positive. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 6 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-healpy , python3-healpy , python-healpy-debuginfo ---> Packages are stand-alone and debuginfo is autogenerated. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-healpy-1.10.3-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm python3-healpy-1.10.3-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm python-healpy-debuginfo-1.10.3-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm python-healpy-1.10.3-1.fc27.src.rpm python2-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) healpix -> heal pix, heal-pix, healthily python2-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US healpix -> heal pix, heal-pix, healthily python2-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US visualisation -> visualization, salivation, nationalist python2-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US matplotlib -> diplomatic python2-healpy.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python2-healpy.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python3-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) healpix -> heal pix, heal-pix, healthily python3-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US healpix -> heal pix, heal-pix, healthily python3-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US visualisation -> visualization, salivation, nationalist python3-healpy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US matplotlib -> diplomatic python3-healpy.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python3-healpy.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python-healpy.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) healpix -> heal pix, heal-pix, healthily python-healpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US healpix -> heal pix, heal-pix, healthily python-healpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US visualisation -> visualization, salivation, nationalist python-healpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US matplotlib -> diplomatic python-healpy.src: E: specfile-error Python detected LC_CTYPE=C: LC_ALL & LANG coerced to C.UTF-8 (set another locale or PYTHONCOERCECLOCALE=0 to disable this locale coercion behaviour). python-healpy.src: E: specfile-error Python detected LC_CTYPE=C: LC_ALL & LANG coerced to C.UTF-8 (set another locale or PYTHONCOERCECLOCALE=0 to disable this locale coercion behaviour). python-healpy.src: E: specfile-error Python detected LC_CTYPE=C: LC_ALL & LANG coerced to C.UTF-8 (set another locale or PYTHONCOERCECLOCALE=0 to disable this locale coercion behaviour). 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 16 warnings. ---> Nothing to worry here. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: python-healpy-debuginfo-1.10.3-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Requires -------- python2-healpy (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libcfitsio.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit) libgomp.so.1()(64bit) libhealpix_cxx.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) python(abi) python2-astropy python2-matplotlib python2-six rtld(GNU_HASH) python3-healpy (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libcfitsio.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit) libgomp.so.1()(64bit) libhealpix_cxx.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython3.6m.so.1.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) python(abi) python3-astropy python3-matplotlib python3-six rtld(GNU_HASH) python-healpy-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python2-healpy: python-healpy python-healpy(x86-64) python2-healpy python2-healpy(x86-64) python2.7dist(healpy) python2dist(healpy) python3-healpy: python3-healpy python3-healpy(x86-64) python3.6dist(healpy) python3dist(healpy) python-healpy-debuginfo: python-healpy-debuginfo python-healpy-debuginfo(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- python2-healpy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_fitsio_lib.so python2-healpy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_pixel_lib.so python2-healpy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_sph_transform_lib.so python2-healpy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/healpy/_pixelfunc.so python2-healpy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/healpy/_query_disc.so python2-healpy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/healpy/_sphtools.so python3-healpy: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_fitsio_lib.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-healpy: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_pixel_lib.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-healpy: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_sph_transform_lib.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-healpy: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/healpy/_pixelfunc.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-healpy: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/healpy/_query_disc.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-healpy: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/healpy/_sphtools.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/h/healpy/healpy-1.10.3.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 43bdccb0081b3b5a72a9c1f523c367bc2cba91f989a60047d8043685a3beb81b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 43bdccb0081b3b5a72a9c1f523c367bc2cba91f989a60047d8043685a3beb81b Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1440216 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 ===== Solution ===== Package APPROVED!!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx