Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-07-26 16:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > So first of all, using FSF Binutils for a Linux/glibc target is not a problem. > The "Linux Binutils" H.J.Lu releases are actually snapshots from FSF CVS (this > is why they usually have 2.x.90 numbering) with some patches applied, and only > tested for Linux targets. FSF releases go through an actual release process, > they aren't snapshotted straight out of CVS like the "Linux Binutils". This has > both advantages (more testing, less regressions) and disadvantages (not always > the latest bugfixes). If FSF Binutils is what all the other SDKs for this > targets use, it is the right choice here. Yes, fsf binutils is what the other sdk's use, including open2x's sdk, which is the closest thing to upstream the arm-gp2x-linux packages have, see: http://open2x.org/open2x/index.html So I definetively want to stick with fsf binutils 2.16.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review