https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428974 --- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Note: There are automatic tools (such as FedoraReview [0]) parsing the comments in a prescribed format. So if you ever want to correct a spec or srpm URL, please post it again: Spec URL: https://sanqui.net/etc/fedora/rgbds-0.2.5-2/rgbds.spec SRPM URL: https://sanqui.net/etc/fedora/rgbds-0.2.5-2/rgbds-0.2.5-2.fc25.src.rpm --------------- Will you report the failing tests upstream? --------------- Package is approved (informally, as you have not yet been sponsored). --------------- About the sponsorship: Could you do a couple of informal reviews? Indicate that you are not yet sponsored and thus cannot do a proper review (and set no flags, do not assign to you). Please add me to CC when you do so. There are dozens of open reviews for python packages at [1], if you want to go that way. I also have a few open, if you want to do some reviews for me, see [2] (right column, "Packages" section, "Without reviewer"). (I'm not posting direct links, as they are very ugly and long.) The review process is described at [3] and [4] - [0] will help you a lot. --------------- [0] https://github.com/timlau/FedoraReview [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python#Review_Python_packages [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Churchyard [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx