[Bug 1426465] Review Request: libiio - Library for Industrial IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465



--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #2)
> 
> > - __pycache__ looks not recognized as property of this package
> 
> What do you mean by that?

It was present and not packaged.

> 
> > - You don't need to use %doc. HTML documentation is already in
> >   %_pkgdocdir directory.
> 
> Sure, but what problem does this cause?

None i guess, it is just redundant.

> 
> > - Fix wrong Python interpreter:
> > python3-iio.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
> > /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py /usr/bin/env python
> > python3-iio.noarch: E: non-executable-script
> > /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> > 
> > - You can compile the example files inside 'examples' directory (needs
> > 'cdk-devel' package):
> 
> Sure, but I do see them as providing much value as actual binaries hence I
> didn't. Could possibly include them in -devel as source, but again not sure
> that provides much value.
> 
> > sed -e 's|cdk/cdk.h|cdk.h|g' -i examples/iio-monitor.c
> > make CFLAGS="%optflags -I../ -I%{_includedir}" LDFLAGS="%__global_ldflags
> > -L../ -liio" -C examples
> > 
> > ===== MUST items =====
> > 
> > C/C++:
> > [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
> > [x]: Package contains no static executables.
> > [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> > [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
> > [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
> > [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
> > [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> > 
> > Generic:
> > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> >      other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
> >      Guidelines.
> > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> >      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
> >      found: "BSD (3 clause)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or
> >      generated". 46 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
> >      licensecheck in /home/sagitter/1426465-libiio/licensecheck.txt
> > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
> > [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> >      Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.6/site-
> >      packages, /usr/lib/python3.6
> > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> >      Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.6/site-
> >      packages/__pycache__(python36)
> > [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
> > [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> > [x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
> > [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
> > [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
> > [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> > [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
> > [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
> >      names).
> > [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> > [x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
> > [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
> > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
> >      Provides are present.
> > [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> > [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
> > [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
> > [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
> > [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
> > [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
> > [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
> >      one supported primary architecture.
> > [x]: Package installs properly.
> > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
> >      Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
> > [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
> >      license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
> >      license(s) for the package is included in %license.
> > [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> > [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
> >      that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
> > [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> > [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
> >      beginning of %install.
> > [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
> > [x]: Dist tag is present.
> > [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
> > [x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
> > [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
> >      work.
> > [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
> > [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
> > [x]: Package is not relocatable.
> > [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
> >      provided in the spec URL.
> > [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
> >      %{name}.spec.
> > [x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
> > [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
> > 
> > Python:
> > [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
> >      process.
> > [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
> >      provide egg info.
> > [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
> > [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
> > [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
> > 
> > ===== SHOULD items =====
> > 
> > Generic:
> > [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
> >      file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
> > [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
> > [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> >      Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libiio-
> >      debuginfo
> > [ ]: Package functions as described.
> > [x]: Latest version is packaged.
> > [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
> > [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
> > [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
> >      translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
> > [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
> >      architectures.
> > [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> > [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
> >      files.
> > [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
> > [x]: Buildroot is not present
> > [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
> >      $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
> > [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
> > [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
> > [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
> > [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
> > [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
> > [x]: SourceX is a working URL.
> > [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
> > 
> > ===== EXTRA items =====
> > 
> > Generic:
> > [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
> >      is arched.
> >      Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1310720 bytes in /usr/share
> > [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
> >      Note: No rpmlint messages.
> > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
> >      Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
> > [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
> > 
> > 
> > Rpmlint
> > -------
> > Checking: libiio-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
> >           libiio-utils-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
> >           libiio-devel-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
> >           python3-iio-0.9-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
> >           libiio-debuginfo-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
> >           libiio-0.9-1.fc26.src.rpm
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_info
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_genxml
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_adi_xflow_check
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_reg
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_readdev
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iiod
> > libiio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> > python3-iio.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libiio -> libido
> > python3-iio.noarch: W: no-documentation
> > python3-iio.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
> > /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py /usr/bin/env python
> > python3-iio.noarch: E: non-executable-script
> > /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Rpmlint (debuginfo)
> > -------------------
> > Checking: libiio-debuginfo-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
> > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Rpmlint (installed packages)
> > ----------------------------
> > sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
> > libiio.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libiio.so.0.9
> > /lib64/liblzma.so.5
> > libiio.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libiio.so.0.9
> > /lib64/libz.so.1
> > libiio.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libiio.so.0.9
> > /lib64/libm.so.6
> > libiio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> > python3-iio.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libiio -> libido
> > python3-iio.noarch: W: no-documentation
> > python3-iio.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
> > /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py /usr/bin/env python
> > python3-iio.noarch: E: non-executable-script
> > /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_adi_xflow_check
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_genxml
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_info
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_readdev
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_reg
> > libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iiod
> > 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 13 warnings.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Requires
> > --------
> > libiio (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> >     /sbin/ldconfig
> >     libc.so.6()(64bit)
> >     liblzma.so.5()(64bit)
> >     libm.so.6()(64bit)
> >     libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> >     librt.so.1()(64bit)
> >     libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
> >     libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit)
> >     libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit)
> >     libz.so.1()(64bit)
> >     rtld(GNU_HASH)
> > 
> > libiio-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> > 
> > libiio-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> >     /usr/bin/pkg-config
> >     libiio(x86-64)
> >     libiio.so.0()(64bit)
> > 
> > python3-iio (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> >     libiio(x86-64)
> >     python(abi)
> > 
> > libiio-utils (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> >     libc.so.6()(64bit)
> >     libiio(x86-64)
> >     libiio.so.0()(64bit)
> >     libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> >     rtld(GNU_HASH)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Provides
> > --------
> > libiio:
> >     libiio
> >     libiio(x86-64)
> >     libiio.so.0()(64bit)
> > 
> > libiio-debuginfo:
> >     libiio-debuginfo
> >     libiio-debuginfo(x86-64)
> > 
> > libiio-devel:
> >     libiio-devel
> >     libiio-devel(x86-64)
> >     pkgconfig(libiio)
> > 
> > python3-iio:
> >     python3-iio
> >     python3.6dist(libiio)
> >     python3dist(libiio)
> > 
> > libiio-utils:
> >     libiio-utils
> >     libiio-utils(x86-64)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Source checksums
> > ----------------
> > https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/libiio/archive/v0.9.tar.gz :
> >   CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
> > b6184876d192fbfd51e3a0a29736fa1be2dbaf07370cf861797076f40a85f823
> >   CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
> > b6184876d192fbfd51e3a0a29736fa1be2dbaf07370cf861797076f40a85f823
> > 
> > 
> > Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
> > Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --mock-options=--no-clean -m
> > fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1426465
> > Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
> > Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
> > Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP
> > Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]