https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261 --- Comment #20 from Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #19) > ... I don't think we really want a package called "-ugly" in Fedora. IIUC the plugin packages are named "good", "bad", and "ugly" after some cultural reference. The GStreamer website has a lengthy description of these names and the criteria for what falls into each. > If the plugin _formerly_ was in category 2 but is cleared and is GPL, shouldn't > it be just moved to -good or -base? If it's in category 1, maybe something like > -non-lgpl (or -gpl, if that's what they all actually are), rather than > "ugly"? GPL plugins will always stay in -ugly. In theory, it is possible that mpg123 might be moved to -good or even -base in the future, but I'm not involved with GStreamer upstream, so I can't say if and when that might be considered. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx