Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2007-07-26 12:37 EST ------- Review for release 2.fc6: * RPM name is OK * Source nvidia-settings-1.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST As linking with oyranos work and runtime of oyranos works, then run test for the library works... Good! * running rpmlint on installed files: [root@Kwizatz libXNVCtrl]# rpmlint libXNVCtrl W: libXNVCtrl incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-2 1.0-2.kwizart.fc6 W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XReply W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XMissingExtension W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XFlush W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XEatData W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextRemoveDisplay W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextCreateExtension W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XRead W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XSetLastRequestRead W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextFindDisplay W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XSend W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextAddDisplay [root@Kwizatz libXNVCtrl]# ldd /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaaace7000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000) I wonder if this can be solved by adding -lX11 (or something else) which seems needed by BR, i'm searching how to works with thoses issues... where they could be safety ignored for the review (we need at least to advices upstream about this...), i wonder if this could be solved by some tweaks ?... Notes: Thats the only issue it remains (for what i am aware...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review