https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432122 --- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #10) > (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #9) > > (In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #8) > > > Also, I do believe the package should be called "perl-BackupPC-XS" since it > > > provides nothing but Perl bindings only. > > > > In hindsight it would probably be a good idea but not worth a package > > rename. The guidelines only reference naming of CPAN modules[1] so they > > could be more clear. > > BTW, it's provided on CPAN: https://metacpan.org/pod/BackupPC::XS > I always considered it a CPAN module. So naming it with "perl" prefix > definitely would be more clear. Well, google failed me then. In either case, since it's only used with BackupPC and not intended to be used by anyone else I don't think it's worth changing at this point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx