https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #6) > (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #5) > > I wonder why do we have libmad plugin enabled. AFAIK mad development was > > halted ~12 years ago or so. On the contrary mpg123' development is still > > ongoing. > > > > Does mad plugin provides some extra functionality missing in mpg123? > > Performance benefits? > > mad has been around longer and therefore more established. The mpg123 > plugin was just moved from -bad to -ugly, and also has lower rank than mad. > Therefore, without any additional information, I have to presume that the > GStreamer developers consider the mad plugin to be preferred; whether that > can or should be changed would be up to them. Turned out that mad-plugin was removed from the repo: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-ugly/commit/ext?id=2f767fb So we should stick with mpg123. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx