https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432122 --- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #8) > Also, I do believe the package should be called "perl-BackupPC-XS" since it > provides nothing but Perl bindings only. In hindsight it would probably be a good idea but not worth a package rename. The guidelines only reference naming of CPAN modules[1] so they could be more clear. > README is not a pure license file, ca be considered as %doc. Fixed. > As for BR list, please follow one style, and don't mix multiple BRs in one > line. I typically do one per line but like to group ones that are tightly linked together, in this case perl and perl-devel. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#perl_modules -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx