Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-07-24 19:22 EST ------- Nice, I'd love to have a comaintainer, or you're even welcome to it if you were excited about it. I've mostly done RHEL (see http://www.google.com/search?q=Joshua+Daniel+Franklin+site:redhat.com ) but I've maintained a few custom RPMs including pine for local users. I just decided to package alpine since I didn't see why not since it's now nearing 1.0. I turned off the alpine-alpha list after the maildir issue came up again. It's a good idea to include all functionality, I missed LDAP and inews since I'm not using them, but I'm sure someone is. I can't take credit for "/usr/sbin/sendmail" I copied from mutt's spec. :) That's really all that's required, it can be really be exim or sendmail or whatever. I don't think uw-imap-utils is required, mlock is a file-locking program that shouldn't be needed at all on Linux and definitely not by alpine. OK, I just added the changes, rebuilt and rsync'ed the updates. Thanks for catching the SRPM distag issue, I symlinked the old URL but here are the links which match the mock-produced SRPM filename: spec URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine.spec SRPM URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine-0.999-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review