https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426954 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package looks good (full fedora-review output in the attachment). Just two minor remarks: - You *should* re-phrase the %summary to comply with the "summary-not-capitalized" rpmlint warning, for example: "ORG to HTML parser written in Go" (or something like that). Additionally, repeating the project/package name in the summary is frowned upon. - You *could* remove empty %if-%endif blocks (or ones that just contain comments) to clean up the .spec file a bit. But if you want to leave them in, that's fine (and it makes it a bit easier to fill in new dependencies if the package ever grows some in the future). Once you have decided on a "fully compliant" Summary tag, I will approve the package (you don't have to bump the spec file and rebuild the srpm, fixing it upon git import is enough). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx