Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-24 06:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Well, I don't know well about gwave, however is gwave really > not bypassed to proceed the review of this package? To review the package ? well ok, but not functional for _proper_ use ! > Current gspiceui does not require gwave, so you can just ignore > gwave for now? It does require gwave. See its "plot" function depends on gwave. > For gwave: > (In reply to comment #16) > > So now, the question is: > > are we willing to ship > > *the latest gwave and at the same time shipping lots of old dependencies ? > Absolutely, unless the newest gwave has regression issue problems, > for example. Ok, then we will work on that latest gwave. gspiceui's review isn't a problem at all, and will be approved very quickly. But I do care about its functionality (gwave) and have no intention of releasing it half ready. gspiceui is just a GUI upon gwave. We can't release the GUI without the engine which does the whole job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review