[Bug 1428383] Review Request: compat-freerdp12 - Compatibility version of the FreeRDP client libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428383



--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---

1(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #2)
> This would be nice to fix, but I don't know how:
> 
> compat-freerdp12.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl
> /usr/lib64/libfreerdp.so.1.2.0 SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:CryptoPolicies. I found a similar
review of that case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198498


Also use %make_build which is the equivalent for make %{?_smp_mflags}

Once both above part are corrected, the review will be approved. Below lines
are for formality.



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)",
     "*No copyright* Apache", "zlib/libpng", "ISC", "Unicode strict", "BSL
     (v1.0)", "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2 clause)", "MPL (v2.0)", "*No
     copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 712 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/luya/Documents/fedora-
     packaging/review/1428383-compat-freerdp12/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in compat-
     freerdp12-devel , compat-freerdp12-debuginfo
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: compat-freerdp12-1.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
          compat-freerdp12-devel-1.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
          compat-freerdp12-debuginfo-1.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
          compat-freerdp12-1.2.0-2.fc25.src.rpm
compat-freerdp12.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl
/usr/lib64/libfreerdp.so.1.2.0 SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list
compat-freerdp12-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libs ->
lobs, lib, lbs
compat-freerdp12-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
compat-freerdp12-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: compat-freerdp12-debuginfo-1.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
compat-freerdp12.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl
/usr/lib64/libfreerdp.so.1.2.0 SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list
compat-freerdp12-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libs ->
lobs, lib, lbs
compat-freerdp12-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
compat-freerdp12-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.



Requires
--------
compat-freerdp12 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libX11.so.6()(64bit)
    libXcursor.so.1()(64bit)
    libXext.so.6()(64bit)
    libXfixes.so.3()(64bit)
    libXi.so.6()(64bit)
    libXinerama.so.1()(64bit)
    libXrender.so.1()(64bit)
    libXv.so.1()(64bit)
    libasound.so.2()(64bit)
    libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit)
    libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4)(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.10()(64bit)
    libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit)
    libcups.so.2()(64bit)
    libdl.so.2()(64bit)
    libfreerdp-client.so.1.2()(64bit)
    libfreerdp.so.1.2()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgsm.so.1()(64bit)
    libgstapp-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgstreamer-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgstvideo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libjpeg.so.62()(64bit)
    libjpeg.so.62(LIBJPEG_6.2)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libpulse.so.0()(64bit)
    libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0)(64bit)
    librt.so.1()(64bit)
    libssl.so.10()(64bit)
    libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit)
    libwinpr.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libxkbfile.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

compat-freerdp12-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

compat-freerdp12-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    cmake
    compat-freerdp12(x86-64)
    libfreerdp-client.so.1.2()(64bit)
    libfreerdp.so.1.2()(64bit)
    libwinpr.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libxfreerdp-client.so.1.2()(64bit)
    pkgconfig
    pkgconfig(libssl)
    pkgconfig(winpr)
    pkgconfig(zlib)



Provides
--------
compat-freerdp12:
    compat-freerdp12
    compat-freerdp12(x86-64)
    libfreerdp-client.so.1.2()(64bit)
    libfreerdp.so.1.2()(64bit)
    libwinpr.so.1.1()(64bit)
    libxfreerdp-client.so.1.2()(64bit)

compat-freerdp12-debuginfo:
    compat-freerdp12-debuginfo
    compat-freerdp12-debuginfo(x86-64)

compat-freerdp12-devel:
    cmake(FreeRDP)
    cmake(WinPR)
    compat-freerdp12-devel
    compat-freerdp12-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(freerdp)
    pkgconfig(winpr)



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/audin-client-alsa.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/audin-client-pulse.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/audin-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/disp-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/drive-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/echo-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/parallel-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/printer-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/rdpei-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/rdpgfx-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/rdpsnd-client-alsa.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/rdpsnd-client-pulse.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/serial-client.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/tsmf-client-alsa-audio.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/tsmf-client-gstreamer-decoder.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/tsmf-client-pulse-audio.so
compat-freerdp12: /usr/lib64/freerdp/tsmf-client.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/archive/1.2.0-beta1+android9.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
b4e7810d90ee8a81075674c4aa9412dcd5409980a653f9059c05969927253ca0
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
b4e7810d90ee8a81075674c4aa9412dcd5409980a653f9059c05969927253ca0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]