Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-24 03:27 EST ------- Now debuginfo rpm is correct. For 1.2.4-0.2: * License - Under which is the whole package of libgeotiff licensed ? Public domain or MIT? As far as I checked the source codes, many codes are under MIT (X). * pkgconfig .pc file - Currently pkg-config returns: -------------------------------------------------- $ pkg-config --cflags libgeotiff -I/usr/include/libgeotiff/libgeotiff -------------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership issue -------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/epsg_csv/alias.csv libgeotiff-1.2.4-0.2.rc1.fc8 $ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/epsg_csv/ file /usr/share/epsg_csv is not owned by any package -------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #5) > At a point my plan is to split separate epsg-data.noarch one and re-base > gdal and geotiff over it. Thats should be clearest way include EPSG > dataset, and trace down how csv files are generated. * A question: - Are there any other (splitted) source which contains only EPSG data or are you going to create epsg-data rpm as a subpackage of libgeotiff? - When epsg-data is splitted out, will epsg-data be needed only to rebuild libgeotiff or gdal, or will it be needed even for runtime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review