https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425073 James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> --- ===== Issues ===== * Extra boilerplate - Please remove the older el5 based boilerplate before import * Assuming package works as %check runs and passes * The phpci failed - phpci tried to look at a symlink pointing at nothing, not an issue * Dangling relative symlink in rpmlint - On checking an actual install it points to a valid file ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/james/workspace /fedora-scm/1425073-php-zendframework-zendservice- recaptcha/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot: present but not needed [!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. PHP: [x]: Run phpci static analyze on all php files. Note: Test run failed Rpmlint ------- Checking: php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha-3.0.0-2.fc26.noarch.rpm php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha-3.0.0-2.fc26.src.rpm php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://framework.zend.com/ HTTP Error 405: Method Not Allowed php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/php/ZendService/ReCaptcha/autoload.php ../../Zend/autoload.php php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Zend -> Zens, Zen, End php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Zend -> Zens, Zen, End php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.src: W: invalid-url URL: https://framework.zend.com/ HTTP Error 405: Method Not Allowed php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.src: W: strange-permission makesrc.sh 775 php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.src: W: invalid-url Source0: 6c6877c07c8ac73b187911ea5d264a640b234361/php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha-3.0.0-6c6877c.tgz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://framework.zend.com/ HTTP Error 405: Method Not Allowed php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/php/ZendService/ReCaptcha/autoload.php ../../Zend/autoload.php 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Requires -------- php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): php(language) php-composer(zendframework/zend-http) php-composer(zendframework/zend-json) php-json Provides -------- php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha: php-composer(zendframework/zendservice-recaptcha) php-zendframework-zendservice-recaptcha Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1425073 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 ===== Conclusion ===== Package is APPROVED with the old boilerplate removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx