https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465 --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 1290240 bytes in 113 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation - Please, separate HTML docs in a noarch sub-package. - Many source files are licensed under a LGPLv2+ license. I guess it's correct using LGPLv2+ as main license. - __pycache__ looks not recognized as property of this package - You don't need to use %doc. HTML documentation is already in %_pkgdocdir directory. - Fix wrong Python interpreter: python3-iio.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py /usr/bin/env python python3-iio.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py 644 /usr/bin/env python - You can compile the example files inside 'examples' directory (needs 'cdk-devel' package): sed -e 's|cdk/cdk.h|cdk.h|g' -i examples/iio-monitor.c make CFLAGS="%optflags -I../ -I%{_includedir}" LDFLAGS="%__global_ldflags -L../ -liio" -C examples ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 46 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/sagitter/1426465-libiio/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages, /usr/lib/python3.6 [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/__pycache__(python36) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libiio- debuginfo [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1310720 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libiio-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm libiio-utils-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm libiio-devel-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm python3-iio-0.9-1.fc26.noarch.rpm libiio-debuginfo-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm libiio-0.9-1.fc26.src.rpm libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_info libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_genxml libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_adi_xflow_check libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_reg libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_readdev libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iiod libiio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib python3-iio.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libiio -> libido python3-iio.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-iio.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py /usr/bin/env python python3-iio.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py 644 /usr/bin/env python 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libiio-debuginfo-0.9-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory libiio.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libiio.so.0.9 /lib64/liblzma.so.5 libiio.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libiio.so.0.9 /lib64/libz.so.1 libiio.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libiio.so.0.9 /lib64/libm.so.6 libiio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib python3-iio.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libiio -> libido python3-iio.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-iio.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py /usr/bin/env python python3-iio.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/iio.py 644 /usr/bin/env python libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_adi_xflow_check libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_genxml libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_info libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_readdev libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iio_reg libiio-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iiod 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 13 warnings. Requires -------- libiio (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) liblzma.so.5()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libiio-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libiio-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libiio(x86-64) libiio.so.0()(64bit) python3-iio (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libiio(x86-64) python(abi) libiio-utils (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libiio(x86-64) libiio.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- libiio: libiio libiio(x86-64) libiio.so.0()(64bit) libiio-debuginfo: libiio-debuginfo libiio-debuginfo(x86-64) libiio-devel: libiio-devel libiio-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(libiio) python3-iio: python3-iio python3.6dist(libiio) python3dist(libiio) libiio-utils: libiio-utils libiio-utils(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/libiio/archive/v0.9.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b6184876d192fbfd51e3a0a29736fa1be2dbaf07370cf861797076f40a85f823 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b6184876d192fbfd51e3a0a29736fa1be2dbaf07370cf861797076f40a85f823 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --mock-options=--no-clean -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1426465 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx